The judicial review of the constitutionality of laws, its procedural organization, and the continuous search for its limits are directly related to the particular problems posed by the interpretation of the Constitution, in relation to the general issues of legal interpretation.

Now, indeed, the judicial review of constitutionality is cross-referenced procedurally and methodologically with the review of the possible incompatibility of laws with EU Law and International Human Rights Law, especially with the ECHR and its protocols, within the framework of multi-level constitutionalism and the plurality of legal orders that each claim, with self-referential grounding, superiority, and priority of application in their field.

These two chapters, the interpretation of the Constitution and the judicial review of the constitutionality of laws, constitute the core of contemporary Constitutional Law. They shape the field in which the general theory of Constitutional Law is tested, the protection of democracy and the rule of law, and the historical composition of liberal democracy, national, European, and international protection of human rights, the relationship between national Constitution and EU Law, the ECHR, and more generally international protection of human rights.

In this field, the interdisciplinarity is tested, as well as the particular scientific identity of Constitutional Law. Moreover, this field is primarily critical in practice, including the procedural framework within which the judicial review of constitutionality is exercised and the interpretation of the application of the Constitution takes place, and it is what mainly communicates with the comparative data that enrich and test the relevant theoretical reflection.

In this field, the international discussion is constantly evolving, and the relevant bibliography is enormous. The volume of comparative data is equally large. Within the international map, the Greek case always maintains its procedural autonomy and its comparative interest.

This book is addressed to students who, before obtaining their degree, engage in the deepening of Public Law, to postgraduate students, to legal practitioners, judicial officers, and lawyers who contribute to shaping the reality of judicial review of constitutionality and the interpretation of the Constitution. The method of presentation and evaluation of the claim of unconstitutionality is always an open problem that requires practical solutions, in accordance with the Constitution, but also with the case law of the ECHR and the CJEU.